Welcome to the Imperial Archives! The main source of information in the Galactic Empire. Be sure to check out the Editing Protocol before making new pages or editing articles. If you need help feel free to contact the Archives manager at archives@swc-empire.com !
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Vodoist"
m |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
My concern is that if we are deleting pages because they should be in another form, and that form does not yet exist, then we are actually losing content (especially given the risk that it will never be recreated--due to forgetfulness, business, or anything else--in that alternative but superior form). Same with the Starfighter page. I think any deletions on that basis should wait until the "replacement" content that you desire is created. --[[User:DT|DT]] 09:29, 19 August 2012 (CDT) | My concern is that if we are deleting pages because they should be in another form, and that form does not yet exist, then we are actually losing content (especially given the risk that it will never be recreated--due to forgetfulness, business, or anything else--in that alternative but superior form). Same with the Starfighter page. I think any deletions on that basis should wait until the "replacement" content that you desire is created. --[[User:DT|DT]] 09:29, 19 August 2012 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Which is why they are marked for deletion and not actually deleted yet. But if they are tagged, I won't forget that they need to be altered and possibly removed afterwards. | ||
| + | ~Elvira Falston | ||
Revision as of 18:13, 19 August 2012
Don't think this page should be deleted. Doesn't it usefully define a historical term? --DT 23:21, 18 August 2012 (CDT)
If removed, it wouldn't be gone completely. I would simply prefer that the entire Charon vs. Vodo debacle is put into one article. And it takes only one line to explain Charonist and Vodoist, so it would be cleaner to explain these terms in that one article, instead of having an article for each word. ~Elvira Falston
Makes sense. If you absolutely have to go into detail on the terms, you can just allocate them a sub-topic in the same article anyway. - Dante Erinith
My concern is that if we are deleting pages because they should be in another form, and that form does not yet exist, then we are actually losing content (especially given the risk that it will never be recreated--due to forgetfulness, business, or anything else--in that alternative but superior form). Same with the Starfighter page. I think any deletions on that basis should wait until the "replacement" content that you desire is created. --DT 09:29, 19 August 2012 (CDT)
Which is why they are marked for deletion and not actually deleted yet. But if they are tagged, I won't forget that they need to be altered and possibly removed afterwards. ~Elvira Falston
