Welcome to the Imperial Archives! The main source of information in the Galactic Empire. Be sure to check out the Editing Protocol before making new pages or editing articles. If you need help feel free to contact the Archives manager at archives@swc-empire.com !
Difference between revisions of "Imperial Archives:Rejuve"
From Imperial Archives
Jinx Ocano (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
|Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | |Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | ||
|No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible but should not be prioritised over pages requiring more significant refactoring. | |No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible but should not be prioritised over pages requiring more significant refactoring. | ||
| − | | | + | |[[:Category:Featured_Articles]] |
|- | |- | ||
!style="background: teal;color:white;"|Excellent | !style="background: teal;color:white;"|Excellent | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
|Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | |Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | ||
|Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. | |Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. | ||
| − | | | + | |[[:Category:Excellent_Articles]] |
|- | |- | ||
!style="background: forestgreen;color:white;"|Good | !style="background: forestgreen;color:white;"|Good | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
|Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | |Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | ||
|Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | |Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | ||
| − | | | + | |[[:Category:Good_Articles]] |
|- | |- | ||
!style="background: lightsteelblue;"|Fair | !style="background: lightsteelblue;"|Fair | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
|Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | |Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | ||
|Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | |Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | ||
| − | | | + | |[[:Category:Fair_Articles]] |
|- | |- | ||
!style="background: khaki;"|Stub | !style="background: khaki;"|Stub | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
|Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | |Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | ||
|Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class article to step up to a Fair-class article is to expand on those areas which give context to why the topic is significant, alongside improving the prose quality. | |Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class article to step up to a Fair-class article is to expand on those areas which give context to why the topic is significant, alongside improving the prose quality. | ||
| − | | | + | |[[:Category:Stub_articles]] |
|} | |} | ||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
*[[User: Arkonis Deadrorian]] | *[[User: Arkonis Deadrorian]] | ||
*[[User: Arthur Smith]] | *[[User: Arthur Smith]] | ||
| − | + | *[[User: Jinx Ocano]] | |
==Useful links== | ==Useful links== | ||
*[[:Category: Articles for Deletion]] - list of all articles nominated for deletion | *[[:Category: Articles for Deletion]] - list of all articles nominated for deletion | ||
Latest revision as of 23:49, 2 February 2024
This is an Out of Character (OOC) Article.
Project Rejuve is an IIS project run within the Ministry of Culture, which aims to modernise the Imperial Archives and make it more useful for those who wish to read or contribute. This is an OOC project.
Contents
Guide
Grades of article
| Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Featured | The article has been selected as a Featured Article, as selected by Imperial Archives administrators. It is:
Structurally, it has:
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible but should not be prioritised over pages requiring more significant refactoring. | Category:Featured_Articles |
| Excellent | The article meets all the criteria for Good class, and is also essentially content-complete in the judgement of Imperial Archives administrators. It could be taken to Featured Article class though further polishing of the prose, style tweaks, additional images or the like. | Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. | Category:Excellent_Articles |
| Good | The article meets all the criteria set out in Imperial Archives:A Good Article. | Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Category:Good_Articles |
| Fair | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. | Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Category:Fair_Articles |
| Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Majorly incomplete, with little meaningful content. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class article to step up to a Fair-class article is to expand on those areas which give context to why the topic is significant, alongside improving the prose quality. | Category:Stub_articles |
Importance of Articles
Articles are of differing importance, and the most important articles should be brought to Good quality as a priority. Project Rejuve members should focus on completing the top two tiers prior to spending much time on the rest, although you are welcome to edit anything should the mood strike.
- Max importance - branch pages, Throne and former Throne character pages
- Top importance - current formations (eg taskforces, NATs, ministries), IHC character pages, IU pages/pages with diplomatic relevance
- Moderate importance - major SWC canon/RP flavour (important events, cultural fixtures, key planets/cities, etc), historic branches, historic IHC
- Low importance - Minor formations/very old historical information, historic formations, minor SWC canon/RP flavour/culture
- Least importance - Character pages not covered elsewhere, unimportant historical events, content primarily of interest only to its author
Flagging for deletion
Articles can be removed entirely only by an administrator of the Imperial Archives. To queue one, use the {{Deletion}} template, at the top of the page. Pages should be marked for deletion if they meet one or more of the following criteria:
- The article is about a subject of low importance, and is currently a stub and any relevant information it provides has already been merged into any other relevant pages.
- The information is mostly or entirely non-canon, including non-SWC canon, and the article is of low importance such that it is not worth reworking.
- The article is patent nonsense, spam, or is otherwise malicious.
Team
- User: Mordus Nordstroem
- User: Joseph Chamberlain
- User: Nyla Barrett
- User: Arkonis Deadrorian
- User: Arthur Smith
- User: Jinx Ocano
Useful links
- Category: Articles for Deletion - list of all articles nominated for deletion
